What should officers do if a suspect refuses a chemical test?

When a suspect refuses a chemical test, officers should document the refusal and follow established protocols. This is important for several reasons. Firstly, it ensures that there is a clear and formal record of the suspect's refusal, which can be crucial for any legal proceedings that may follow. Proper documentation serves as evidence demonstrating that the suspect chose not to comply with the test, which can influence the case's outcome.

Following protocols is essential because law enforcement agencies typically have defined procedures for handling such refusals. These procedures may include informing the suspect of the legal implications of their refusal, such as possible administrative penalties or consequences related to their driving privileges, which may vary by jurisdiction. Adhering to these protocols helps ensure that the officers remain compliant with the law and uphold the rights of the suspect while also protecting the integrity of the investigation.

While the other options suggest either ignoring the situation or taking inappropriate actions like forcibly administering a test, those actions can violate legal standards and respect for individual rights, leading to potential liability for the officers involved. Thus, documenting and following protocol is the correct and responsible course of action in such scenarios.